NIS2 is no longer a future requirement. As of June 2026, 23 out of 27 EU Member States have transposed the NIS2 Directive into national law, allowing national authorities to begin enforcement activities. While implementation timelines may vary across jurisdictions, the direction is clear: organizations within the scope of NIS2 are expected to demonstrate compliance … Read more
Ask most compliance teams what NIS2 or DORA requires for third-party risk, and you’ll get a version of the same answer: “We need to assess our vendors and document it.” Technically true. Practically incomplete. Both regulations were written in direct response to a pattern regulator kept seeing companies with strong internal security getting compromised through a vendor, supplier, or service provider nobody scrutinized closely … Read more
Every vendor risk platform on the market wants to tell you the same story: fill out this questionnaire faster, get approved faster, move on with your day. It sounds great. It’s also solving the wrong problem. The Speed Trap Somewhere along the way, the TPRM industry decided that the biggest pain point in vendor risk management was time. So, the … Read more
For years, third-party risk management (TPRM) has followed a familiar pattern. A supplier isonboarded, completes a security questionnaire, shares a few certifications, and passes arisk assessment. The results are documented, filed away, and often not revisited until thenext annual review. Suppliers continuously change their infrastructure, software, personnel, and securitycontrols. New vulnerabilities emerge daily, threat actors … Read more
Third party risk assessment has always been one of the most demanding tasks for compliance and risk teams. Hundreds of vendors. Thousands of pages of security documents. And a growing list of regulatory requirements that hold organizations accountable for every third party they work with. For years, the answer was simple: hire more people, send more questionnaires, and read more documents. But that approach is no longer sustainable. Today, AI is fundamentally changing how organizations assess vendor risk making the process faster, smarter, and more scalable than ever before. Here’s how. The Problem with Traditional Vendor Risk Assessment Most compliance and risk teams today still rely on manual processes: This approach has one major flaw: it doesn’t scale and it takes too long. Reading one SOC 2 report alone can take 2 to … Read more
You just received a SOC 2 report from a vendor. No findings. Clean opinion.Before you mark that assessment as complete stop. A clean SOC 2 report doesn’t mean your risk assessment is done. It means you finally have enough information to start doing it properly. The Dirty Secret About SOC 2 Scope Here’s what a … Read more
Too many security teams treat a SOC 2 with no findings as a green light. Here’s why that assumption is quietly undermining your third-party risk programme. There’s a shortcut that has become dangerously common in third-party risk management: a vendor provides their SOC 2 report, the reviewing team flicks through it, sees no exceptions, no … Read more
The administrative burden of third-party risk management has driven enterprises to offshore the work for decades. But the real issue was never headcount it was tooling. Third-party risk management from a security perspective is not a new discipline especially in banking and financial services, where regulators have demanded structured vendor oversight for decades. Enterprises in … Read more
Automated scanning tools are great but they’re not the whole story. There’s a smarter, faster way to assess your vendors. Search for “third-party cyber risk management” today and you’ll quickly land on a familiar set of names: SecurityScorecard, BitSight, Black Kite. These automated vulnerability scanning tools have become the go-to answer for security teams looking … Read more